Understanding Breed-Specific Legislation

You may be aware of recent developments in the United States and other parts of the world regarding breeds of dog that have been singled out for specific discrimination. This situation arose from dog biting incidents. However, in most cases, the owner rather than the dog is often at fault. Due to the irresponsible actions of a few, dozens of dog breeds and their responsible owners now face being banned or subjected to severe restrictions under new legislation being enacted or considered by countries throughout the world.

Breed-specific legislation bans or restricts particular breeds or mixes. A dog of a banned breed can be confiscated by the authorities and killed. A dog of a restricted breed must be confined, muzzled, chained, or restricted in other ways and owners must provide proof of liability insurance that covers dog bites. In some jurisdictions, dogs of restricted breeds and mixes must be identified by microchip or tattoo and must have mug shots on file with the police.

Breed specific legislations are based on faulty statistics, media hysteria and politicians looking for a quick answer to the increasing number of people being injured or killed by dogs in North America and abroad. It is often stated that deaths from dog bites are about one per 10 million of the population. Any death is not acceptable but let us be practical. Reaching zero risk is not only improbable, it is simply impossible. All human activities entail a level of risk, from eating chicken to crossing a street. Breed bans are an illogical answer that may make certain individuals safer, but will not do a thing to reduce biting accidents.

More about Understanding Breed-Specific Legislation.